I opened up the mailbag on the latest Locke On Celtics and was asked about the hot topic that’s been buzzing around the league lately - three-pointers. There’s been a lot of chatter about how they’re ruining the game, making it unwatchable, and how we need to change the rules. But I’ve got to tell you, I think that’s a load of nonsense.
First off, let’s address this idea that eliminating or limiting three-pointers would make the game more exciting. Spoiler alert: it won’t. If we take away the three-point line, what do you think is going to happen? Teams are just going to pack the paint and we’ll end up with a bunch of 19-foot jumpers instead of 25-footers. How is that more exciting?
Here’s the thing - people seem to have this nostalgic view of how basketball used to be played. They think removing three-pointers will bring back some golden age of passing and movement. But guess what? The assist numbers today are pretty much in line with what we saw back in the Bird era. The passing is still there, folks.
Now, I get it. Watching good three-point shooters miss 65% of their shots isn’t always thrilling. But the impact of those made shots is huge. And let’s be real, would you rather see Al Horford taking a bunch of top-of-the-key jumpers like KG used to, or stepping back a couple feet for a three? I know which one I find more exciting.
Here’s my take: the three-pointer isn’t the problem. It’s a scapegoat. People are looking at declining ratings and blaming it on long-range shooting without considering any other factors. But the reality is, the three-pointer creates space, opens up driving lanes, and adds an element of excitement to the game.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for tweaking things. I’ve been advocating for eliminating the corner three because it’s a shorter shot that shouldn’t have the same value as an above-the-break three. But completely getting rid of the three-pointer? That’s throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
Payton Pritchard’s Potential
Now, let’s shift gears and talk about Payton Pritchard. This guy is a solid basketball player, and his potential as a starter is a hot topic. Pritchard thrives in the Celtics’ system, surrounded by talent that demands attention. If he were to start alongside players like Derrick White, Jayson Tatum, and Kristaps Porzingis, he’d excel because defenses can’t afford to double-team him. However, if you put him on a team like the Wizards, where he might face more defensive pressure, his performance could differ. It’s all about the environment and fit, and right now, Pritchard is in the perfect setting to showcase his skills.
Joe Mazzulla’s Approach
Speaking of the Celtics’ system, let’s talk about Joe Mazzulla’s approach to motivating these guys. I got a question about him setting statistical goals for the team, and I don’t think he’s the kind of guy who does that. Mazzulla doesn’t focus on specific stats like steals or assists. Instead, he emphasizes playing the right way—being in the right position, making smart reads, and communicating effectively. By focusing on these fundamentals, the stats naturally fall into place. It’s a philosophy that keeps the team from getting too caught up in chasing numbers and instead focuses on playing cohesive, winning basketball.
Other Topics in Today’s Locked On Celtics Podcast:
- Most impressive and disappointing NBA teams so far this season
- Tougher test: Orlando or Houston
- A Simpsons-style NBA broadcast
- Re-casting “The Good Place” with Celtics
